 |
THIS
STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY VIEWING |
Pouring on the salt increases fiscal
pain
Author:
Sandy Coleman
Boston Globe Staff
Published on December 16, 2004
When a purchasing cooperative for area communities
sought bids last spring for road salt, the outcome was unusual
the group rejected all five contract proposals.
Survey tracks how much area communities spent on
road salt last year. "They were too high," said Lara
Thomas, regional administrator of the Southeastern Regional Services
Group. "They ranged from $42.47 a ton to $68 a ton."
The cooperative learned early about what many local
highway supervisors say they still can't get used to the steep
hike in the price of road salt this year. Local officials say
they have seen price increases ranging from $10 to $20 per ton,
which could result in large road budget deficits if the winter
is severe.
Public works officials are looking for new ways
to save money. East Bridgewater, for instance, is among at least
25 municipalities in the state that plan to use a Hungarian-inspired
salt mix called Magic Salt, which is rock salt treated with a
syrupy solution that helps it stick to the pavement better and
last longer than untreated salt. The idea is that less salt would
be needed, resulting in savings, said John Haines, East Bridgewater's
highway surveyor.
"I haven't used it yet. But because of the
increased cost of salt, you'll see people looking at different
alternatives, and you experiment," said Haines, who is paying
$41.66 per ton for road salt this year, versus last year's $32.
But most communities in the area will face winter
with regular road salt, and try to deal with the unexpected jump
in their cost of keeping local roads clear of snow and ice.
Last winter, Stoughton officials paid about $29
a ton; this winter, it's $41 a ton, said Larry Barrett, the town's
public works superintendent. Stoughton used 3,449 tons of salt
last winter, at a cost of $102,867. The same amount would cost
$41,000 more this winter.
Rob Zora, Marion's Department of Public Works superintendent,
said that when he saw his price for salt had jumped from $34.13
a ton to $53.42 a ton, "I got sticker shock."
But, Zora said, "it is what it is, and we are
committed because we need the salt."
Fortunately for him, Marion has relatively few miles
of road to salt compared with other towns. The town used 175 tons
of salt last year, spending $5,972. Big municipalities like Brockton
that have hundreds of miles of major travel arteries are harder
hit by the price hike. Last winter, Brockton used 10,000 tons
of salt and spent $375,000, according to David Bloodsworth, the
mayor's spokesman.
No one is calling for increases in snow removal
budgets, which are traditionally set lower than actual spending.
By state law, the snow removal budget is the only one that municipalities
can allow to operate in a deficit. Town officials are allowed
to roll over the deficit into the next fiscal year, and subtract
it from revenues.
At the state level, legislators this year appropriated
$35 million for snow removal instead of the usual $15 million.
Massachusetts Highway Department officials had been pushing to
increase its snow and ice allocation because the budget always
exceeds the $15 million, said Jon Carlisle, a MassHighway spokesman.
The five-year average for snow and ice spending is about $56 million
a year, he said.
MassHighway takes care of all state and interstate
roads. This winter, MassHighway officials are paying $34.60 a
ton for salt, which is about $10 a ton more than last year's price,
according to Judith Forman, a MassHighway spokeswoman.
The reason for the escalating salt prices is partly
due to the development boom taking place in China and India, according
to industry experts and salt suppliers.
"You can't pick up the paper without reading
[about] the growth rate of China and India," said Bill Creighton,
general manager of Granite State Minerals, a salt supplier in
Portsmouth, N.H. "For these countries to feed their growth
rate, they are buying up everything in the world, from salt to
steel to cement. The demand for these items has outstripped the
supply."
Higher transportation costs also have contributed
to the prices, said Richard I. Hanneman, president of the Salt
Institute, a nonprofit association of salt producers based in
Alexandria, Va. Many salt mines are located outside the United
States the bulk of them in South America and the demand for ocean
shipping has pushed up the cost of moving freight. Also, higher
fuel costs have increased trucking prices, he said.
"It's always been [this way] with salt the
majority of the cost is transportation," said Creighton.
Although the salt prices have jumped, Zora and other highway superintendents
in the region say they can't change their approach to salting
roadways.
"The priority is to get the roads safe. Money
comes second," said Barrett. "No one jumps up and says,
`Great, you saved us money on snow.' They'll jump up if the roads
aren't safe."
Harry Sylvester, Hingham's Department of Public
Works superintendent, agrees: "If you don't salt, you're
setting up for disaster, and then car insurance [premiums] would
go up."
Even if highway officials tried to scrimp on salt
usage, they would have to use more sand to compensate and end
up not saving money, said Sylvester. And using more sand would
pose another financial problem, because the sand has to be swept
up and disposed of in the spring. Appropriate disposal costs money.
In Plymouth, public works director George Crombie
said he is focusing on better management of salt and sand usage
for environmental as well as economic reasons this year. All of
the town's spreaders are being fitted with automated calibrators
that determine the amount of sand and salt to use on roads, instead
of leaving it up to the operators to handle manually, he said.
Paying closer attention to the variables that go
into salt and sand usage, such as weather forecasts, is also important,
he said.
"We're trying to cut our [salt] usage this
year by 10 percent. That's worth about $55,000. But, managing
salt and sand doesn't mean compromising safety," he said.
© Copyright 2004 The New York Times
Company |